Office: CHBA 109
Phone: (405) 325-4981
Email: mrabraham@ou.edu
Group
Homepage Link
Full
Publications List
|
Michael R. Abraham
- David Ross Boyd Professor of
Chemistry and Biochemistry
- B.A. (Grinnell College) 1964
- M.A.T. (Emory University) 1965
- Ph.D. (Florida State University) 1973
- Regents' Award for Superior Teaching,
1982.
- Henry Daniel Rinsland Award for Excellence
in Educational Research, 1998.
|
Division:
- Science/Chemical Education
Research Interests
- Science program development and evaluation;
instructional strategies; student misconceptions
in chemistry; visualization; the role
of computers in instruction.
|
Research Description
As the department's resident "education expert",
I direct degree and research programs that might
be of interest to those concerned with the instructional
aspects of the discipline of chemistry.
Degrees in Chemical Education
The University of Oklahoma offers a Ph.D. in
Chemistry with an emphasis in Chemical Education.
This degree program is one of the few in the country
and is designed:
- To provide prospective college chemistry faculty
members a thorough academic experience in chemistry
and chemical education so that they will be
able to plan, instruct in and direct an undergraduate
chemistry program;
- To provide these students with sufficient
background in learning theory so that they will
be able to design and implement instructional
strategies; design, develop, and evaluate curriculum
materials; and perform research in science education;
- To provide a research experience in chemistry
that will enable these students to direct undergraduate
research projects in chemistry;
Research in Science Education
The focus of my research activities is on three
areas: (1) Instructional Strategies, (2) Misconceptions
in Chemistry, and (3) Computers in Chemical Education.
(1) Instructional Strategies
Instructional strategies and their effect on
student learning of science concepts is one of
our areas of focus. Especially of interest is
inquiry-oriented, laboratory-based instructional
strategies based on modern philosophical and psychological
theories of the nature of science and learning.
Our studies have solidified the research base
for an instructional approach called the Learning
Cycle Approach, and has resulted in its increased
use in science classrooms in recent years. Major
findings: Instructional strategies and curricular
materials designed to teach science concepts are
more effective and result in more positive attitudes
when they provide activities for students to:
(a) explore the concept in a laboratory setting,
(b) discuss the concept with peers and experts,
and (c) apply the concept to see it's pertinence
to other systems and its connections to other
concepts. Furthermore, instructional strategies
are more effective when laboratory is used to
introduce rather than verify concepts.
(2) Misconceptions in Chemistry
Our interest centers on student's conceptions
of scientific phenomena, especially the alternative
conceptions (or misconceptions) students develop
or retain in spite of formal educational efforts.
Our focus is on misconceptions related to atomic
and molecular models (PNM) and how student conceptions
of these models influence learning. Major findings:
Students are reluctant to use PNM explanations
for physical and chemical phenomena unless they
are cued to do so. These misconceptions have many
possible sources including instruction and macroscopic
reasoning. The frequency and type of misconceptions
shows no predictable pattern with respect to experience
with a concept. Depending on the concept and the
nature of the misconception, increased experience
might cause more, less, or the same number of
misconceptions.
(3) Computers in Chemical Education
We are studying how students visualize PNM phenomena.
Our studies concentrate on the use of computer
animation to help students visualize atomic and
molecular behavior. Major findings: Computer animation
visualization can decrease the number and kind
of misconceptions held by beginning chemistry
students. Computers are more effective with instruction
involving the development and use of molecular
models, especially if complex interactions and
motion are involved. Computers are less effective
with instructional tasks involving complex computational
activities. Students with high spatial relations
abilities gain more from the use of kinetics visuals.
Selected Recent Publications
Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M. R., and Renner, J. W.
(1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning
cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills
[Monograph, Number One]. Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research
in Science Teaching.
Haidar, A. H. and Abraham, M. R. (1991). A comparison
of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts
based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10),
919-938.
Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., and Westbrook,
S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding
of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 31(2),
147-165.
Williamson, V. M. and Abraham, M. R. (1995). The
effects of computer animation n the particulate
mental models of college chemistry Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 32(5),
521-534.
Cracolice, M. S. and Abraham, M. R. (1996). A comparison
of computer-assisted instruction, semi-programmed
instruction, and teaching assistant-led instruction
in general chemistry. School Science and Mathematics,
96(4), 215-221.
Abraham, M. R., Cracolice, M. S., Graves, A. P.,
Aladamash, A. H., Kihega, J. G., Palma Gil, J. G.,
and Varghese, V. (1997). The nature and state of
general chemistry laboratory courses offered by
colleges and universities in the United States.
Journal of Chemical Education, 74(5),
591-594, and JCE Online (http://jchemed.chem.wisc.edu/).
University of Oklahoma Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry 620 Parrington Oval, Rm 208 Norman, OK 73019-3051
|