Office: PHSC 130Q
Phone: (405) 325-4969
Email: peklebba@ou.edu
Full
CV (PDF format)
|
Philip E. Klebba
- Professor
- B.S. University of Notre Dame (1975)
- Ph. D. University of California, Berkeley
(1981)
- Postdoctoral Fellow (Stanford University Medical
School) 1981-1982
- Postdoctoral Fellow (University of California,
Berkeley) 1982-1984
- Philippe Foundation International Scholar
Research Award, 1993, 2003.
- Research Award, Centre Nationale Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS), Institute Pasteur, 1993-1994.
- American Society for Microbiology (ASM) International
Professorship, 2001, Universidade de Sao Paulo,
Brasil
- Fulbright Research Scholar, Franco-American,
US State Department, 2002-2003
- Chercheur de l'Institut Nationale de la Sante
et la Recherche Medicale (INSERM), Institut
Necker, Paris, 2002
|
Division:
Research Interests
- Mechanisms of membrane transport, siderophore-mediated
iron acquisition by bacteria, outer membrane
protein structure and function, immune responses
to microbial antigens.
|
Research Description
Iron and the Pathogenicity of Bacteria
Phillip
E. Klebba, Ph. D. and Salete M. C. Newton, Ph. D.
I. Gram-negative
bacterial iron uptake. We are studying the
ability of pathogenic bacteria to obtain the element
iron (Fe) in human and animal hosts. This research spans
several decades, which may be briefly summarized with
a few statements. First, not just microorganisms, but
essentially all organisms, require iron for a variety
of metabolic processes, including energy generation
by cytochrome-containing proteins, DNA synthesis, as
a cofactor in metabolic enzymes, and for detoxification
of reactive oxygen species. Secondly, humans and animals
sequester iron within the body, in forms like transferrin,
lactoferrin and ferritin, as a means of defense against
prokaryotic infection, but microorganisms synthesize
and secrete small organic molecules called siderophores
that actively chelate iron and remove it from eukaryotic
iron-binding proteins (Fig. 1). Furthermore, some bacterial
pathogens may directly utilize the iron in transferrin
or lactoferrin. Thus on the molecular level, iron is
a valuable commodity that is a key element of bacterial
pathogenesis. But unfortunately, the process of iron
acquisition is not well understood in either Gram-positive
or Gram-negative bacteria.

Figure 1. Structure of iron-binding
microbial siderophores (top; molecular mass 700-1000
D) and iron-binding eukaryotic proteins (bottom: molecular
mass 80, 000 - 500,000 D). For comparison, the actual
size and structure of ferric enterobactin is shown next
to that of ferritin.
Regarding Gram-negative organisms, our experiments focus
on the uptake of iron through the outer membrane (OM)
of Escherichia coli (Fig. 2) , a prototypic
bacterium that is like many other pathogens, including
Salmonella typhi (typhoid fever), Vibrio
cholerae (cholera), Shigella dysenteria (dysentery),
Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis) and Yersinia
pestis (plague). The use of E. coli, which
is itself not pathogenic, simplifies the experiments,
but its iron transport systems are exactly comparable
to those of the more severe pathogens. E. coli primarily
obtains iron by the synthesis of the siderophore enterobactin,
that binds iron with very high affinity in the extracellular
environment. The bacteria then transport ferric enterobactin,
in a process that involves several stages. First, the
iron complex binds to a receptor protein in the OM,
called FepA, and through a series of incompletely understood
reactions, FepA internalizes ferric enterobactin (FeEnt)
into the cell (1-3, 5-9, 11-13). This process requires
energy and the action of another cell envelope protein,
TonB, but the biochemical mechanism of transport is
not known.
click image to
view full-sized version
Figure 2. Transport through the Gram-negative
cell envelope. Many experiments in our laboratory
consider the transport mechanisms of small molecules
through proteins of the outer and inner membranes of
bacteria, depicted here from their crystallographic
coordinates.
The OM of gram-negative bacteria is an unusual, asymmetric
bilayer that creates selective permeability: it permits
nutrients and vitamins to enter the cell, but it also
excludes many toxic molecules, like detergents and antibiotics.
These selective permeability properties are critical
to the survival of bacteria, including all of the pathogenic
gram-negative bacteria that cause diseases in animals
and man. One of the ultimate goals of our research program
is to learn enough about the fundamental biochemistry
of outer membrane transport processes as to design strategies
to disrupt them, and thereby combat disease. Without
a known exception, OM proteins transport molecules into
the bacterial cell, and one of the projects in our laboratory
centers around the characterization of their structure
and function. In the past few years a lot of progress
has occurred in this area, primarily from the X-ray
crystallographic solution of the structure of a class
of outer membrane proteins, called porins. Porins are
proteins that form pores through
which materials come into the
cell. Unlike most other membrane proteins, porins are
not anchored in the membrane bilayer by hydrophobic
alpha helices. Rather, they contain a series of membrane-spanning,
amphipathic beta strands that wrap around to form a
barrel. The outside of the barrel is hydrophobic, and
the interior is hydrophilic. Porin beta-barrels sit
in the outer membrane, creating a relatively rigid,
hydrophilic channel across the bilayer.
The recent crystal structure of FepA, which is a special
type of porin, has greatly facilitated our experiments
(Fig. 3). Research on this project include a variety
of approaches to understand the mechanism of iron transport.
Our main methodology is molecular biological: we genetically
engineer mutant proteins to attempt to understand how
the FepA receptor protein passes FeEnt through the OM
bilayer. Another technique that we’ve utilized
is called site-directed spectroscopic labeling, in which
we introduce spectroscopic labels (either fluorescent
or paramagnetic) into the protein structure by covalently
attaching them to genetically engineered cysteine residues
at positions of interest. Once labeled in this way,
we then indirectly monitor the transport of FeEnt through
the receptor by spectroscopic observations (Fig. 4).
Microbiological and biochemical assays of iron binding
and transport are also important to the understanding
of the transport process.

Figure 3. Structure of FepA and ferric
enterobactin. The N-terminal 150 amino acids
of the receptor protein, which form a globular domain
(N-domain), are colored red; the C-terminal 575 residues
(C-domain), which form a transmembrane β-barrel
are colored green. Note that the N-domain inserts itself
within the C-domain, effectively closing the channel.
FepA contains the same basic characteristics as general
porins: an amphipathic beta-barrel that forms a hydrophilic
channel across the outer membrane bilayer. However,
FepA is different in that its channel is closed by an
unusual N-terminal domain that resides within the channel
itself. At present, our laboratory is focused on three
questions about the transport of iron-containing siderophores
by ligand-gated porins like FepA (Fig. 5). First, how
does the receptor properly recognize its correct ligand,
FeEnt, in the environment. Secondly, how does the metal
complex pass through the channel, given that the pore
is completely blocked by the N-terminal domain?
Figure 4. Spectroscopic
measurements of transport.
For an explanation, see references 3 and 4.
The N-terminus must change in some significant way
during transport, either by forming an opening through
which the ferric siderophore passes, or by dislodging
from the existing channel so that is becomes open for
transport. Lastly, in order for transport of the siderophore
to occur, FepA must act in concert with another cell-envelope
protein, called TonB. It is known that this interaction
between FepA and TonB requires metabolic energy, in
the form of proton-motive force, but essentially all
of the other details of the FepA transport mechanism
are unknown. The final major objective of our research
is to determine what is the function of TonB in the
siderophore uptake process.

Figure 5. Proposed mechanism of FeEnt
uptake by FepA.We know that initially, FeEnt
binds to aromatic and basic residues in the surface
loops of FepA Recent experiments showed that the loops
assume an open conformation that is
receptive to the ferric siderophore, and that during
the binding reaction the loops contract into a closed
conformation that holds the iron complex above
the N-domain, ready for transport. We hypothesize that
the next stage of transport involves dislodgement of
the N-domain from the pore, which pulls FeEnt through
the membrane bilayer into the cell. This reaction probably
involves the input of energy and the actions of TonB,
although these assumptions are not yet proven.
Ligand-gated porins like FepA are dynamic receptor proteins
that undergo conformational changes during their transport
reactions. Thus besides their inherent interest and
importance as the basis of the connection between iron
and bacterial virulence, they are prototypic receptors
that illustrate some of the most interesting phenomena
of membrane proteins. In particular, we desire to understand
how they are energized, and how TonB acts to facilitate
their transport activities. Our approaches to these
problems involve genetic engineering of FepA and TonB,
and then analysis of the mutant proteins that we create
by a variety of biochemical and biophysical methodologies.
The results of these experiments usually provide insight
into the mechanism of the iron transport process. In
our laboratory you will acquire a working knowledge
of site-directed mutagenesis, DNA sequencing, ferric
siderophore and membrane protein purification, immunology,
and several other techniques related to membrane protein
biochemistry. Some of our most interesting recent experiments
involve the combination of molecular biology and biophysics,
using genetically engineered Cys residues to introduce
paramagnetic or fluorescent labels into the structure
of bacterial membrane proteins. With these constructions
we were able to monitor the transport of ferric enterobactin
into living bacterial cells (Fig. 4; (3, 4)).
These data ultimately led to our working model of FepA
transport (Fig. 5).
II. Gram-positive bacterial iron uptake.
For all bacteria, the need for iron is problematical.
Iron is unavailable in the aerobic microbial world,
either because it is insoluble or because it is sequestered.
In wild aqueous environments ferric iron rapidly precipitates
as hydroxide polymers, and within animal hosts iron
binding proteins like transferrin, lactoferrin and ferritin
bind the metal with high affinity. Iron also circulates
in the body as hemoglobin, which is normally ensconced
within red blood cells. Indeed, iron is essential to
the vast majority of organisms, but its sequestration
by transferrin in serum and lymph, by lactoferrin in
mucosal secretions, and by ferritin and heme compounds
in cells, normally renders these fluids and tissues
void of prokaryotic life. However, efficient pathogens
overcome this barrier, by either producing siderophores
or by utilizing iron-containing eukaryotic proteins.
The Gram-positive cell envelope is much different from,
and much less characterized than that of Gram-negative
bacteria. Gram positive organisms, like Staphylococcus
aureus (skin infections), Streptococcus pyogenes
(Scarlett fever), Bacillus anthracis (anthrax)
and Listeria monocytogenes (meningitis) do
not contain an outer membrane. Instead their inner membrane
(IM) is covered by a thick layer of peptidoglycan (PG),
in which proteins and lipids are anchored and extend
to the cell surface. Gram-positive bacteria require
iron in comparable amounts to Gram-negative organisms,
but their iron transport systems are comparatively obscure,
in that none of them are biochemically defined. Among
all the Gram-positive bacteria not even a single cell
envelope protein is unambiguously known to transport
iron. In the past few years, nevertheless, many Gram-positive
bacterial genomes were completely sequenced, including
those of all the organisms listed above. All of the
genomes contain loci with homology to iron transporters
of Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 6). These sequence data
present a unique opportunity, the discovery of previously
unknown and uncharacterized membrane transport proteins,
with potentially different mechanisms than those of
E. coli and its relatives.
Listeria
monocytogenes, an ubiquitous pathogen.
Listeria monocytogenes is a prototypic Gram-positive
bacterium that is widespread in nature. It does not
normally belong to the human commensal flora, but its
ability to grow at 4 °C allows it to contaminate
food and cause digestive infections that may become
systemic in immunocompromised individuals and/or pregnant
women. The severity of listeriosis (an overall mortality
of 25-30% in spite of antibiotic therapy) mainly results
from a high frequency of neurological damage associated
with its systemic infections. L. monocytogenes
is an intracellular pathogen: its ability to survive
and multiply in a variety of cell types and tissues,
including macrophages and epithelial cells like hepatocytes,
is a key element of its pathogenicity. Although the
iron uptake processes of Gram-positive bacteria are
not well known, the fact that Listeria actively
proliferates within cells and spreads from cell to cell
suggests that it adeptly obtains iron in the intracellular
environment. Nevertheless, at present the relationship
between iron and listerial virulence remains unclear.
Listeria is not known to secrete siderophores,
but uses exogenously available ferric siderophores made
by other organisms.
click image to
view full-size version
Figure 6. Putative iron transport
loci in the genome of L. monocytogenes.
The indicated genes are fur regulated and
show homology to ferric siderophore transporters of
the E. coli inner membrane.
In our laboratory, we are working on the mechanisms
of iron acquisition by Listeria, and the relationship
between those systems and virulence in a mouse model
system. One of the approaches we use involves genomic
and proteomics: we search for genes that are under
the control of promoters potentially iron-regulated,
and construct Listeria strains in which these genes
are deleted from the chromosome. This enables us to
study the effect of those genes on the growth of the
strain under iron-restricted conditions. The basis
of this approach is to use a technique called allelic
replacement to create deletions of target genes (Fig.
6), and then to analyze the mutant L. monocytogenes
strains for their ability to transport iron, and their
ability to cause disease in mice.
Another approach is to analyze the profile of proteins
produced by the strain under iron-deficient conditions.
When bacteria are deprived of iron, they turn on their
cell envelope iron acquisition systems. These iron-regulated
membrane proteins appear in SDS-PAGE analyses of the
listerial cells. After visualization in this manner,
we purify the proteins that are under iron control,
micro-sequence them to determine their primary structure,
and then identify the genes that encode them from
genomic sequence data. In this different way we find
a potentially different group of cell envelope (or
secreted) proteins that may participate in iron uptake.
At present we are studying four different regions
of the Listeria chromosome, that were identified
by this method, and generating deletions in them by
site-directed deletion mutagenesis.
Several iron acquisition systems were described in
L. monocytogenes, including an inducible
ferric citrate transport system and
a cell-surface localized reductase
that recognizes naturally occurring iron-containing
catecholamines and siderophores. L. monocytogenes
was proposed to use catecholamines as siderophore-like
compounds to bind iron in the blood, and then reduce
the ferric-catecholamine complexes, releasing ferrous
iron intracellularly. However, no specific surface
receptors for iron or iron-containing siderophores
are known to exist in L. monocytogenes. Rather,
the cell surface reductase was proposed to broadly
recognize the iron-centers of different ferric complexes
and reduce them.
click image to
view full-size version
Figure 7. Comparative genomics of
iron uptake. Our recent experiments characterized
and compared, using genomic data, the chromosomal
systems for iron uptake from hemin/hemoglobin by the
proteins encoded by the isd operon of Staphylococcus
aureus and the svpA-srtB locus of L.
monocytogenes. Although they are genetically
very similar, L. monocytogenes apparently
does not acquire iron from hemin/hemoglobin with the
svpA-srtB system (10).
A third
mechanism of iron acquisition may involve a bacterial
cell surface-located transferrin-binding protein,
but the existence of this system has not yet been
experimentally demonstrated. Listeria does
acquire iron from transferrin by an as yet undetermined
process, but no loci with homology to transferrin
receptors were found in the Listeria genome,
perhaps because of structural nuances in the cell
envelope proteins of Gram-positive bacteria. In infected
cells L. monocytogenes may use eukaryotic
iron-containing proteins as a source of the metal,
but the genes for these proposed iron transporters
are not known. We devised a test, called the "siderophore
nutrition assay", that shows the
ability of L. monocytogenes to use various
different sources of iron (Fig. 7). The results of
such assays show that the bacterium can acquire iron
from a variety of ferric siderophores and eukaryotic
iron binding proteins, and we are currently working
to determine the connection between these abilities
and the pathogenesis of Listeria in humans
and animals.
Regulation. We are also interested
in the regulation of iron acquisition in Gram positive
bacteria. Fur ( Ferric uptake regulator)
is the cytoplasmic regulator of many iron transport
reactions in Gram-negative bacteria, and a homolog exists
in Gram-positive bacteria. However, our experiments
indicate that other regulatory systems also operate
in Listeria, and we are attempting to define
them. In recent work, we fused the structural gene for
the green fluorescent protein (GFP) to potential iron
transport genes in the L. monocytogenes chromosome
to demonstrate their regulation by iron availability
(Fig. 8; (10)).
Figure 8.
Expression of GFP under control of the svpA-srtB
promoter. When grown on iron deficient plates (A)
or liquid media (B), cells harboring pGFP15 in
vitro became highly fluorescent, demonstrating
the iron regulation of this locus.
Significance. This
research project will systematically identify and
characterize the iron uptake pathways of one Gram-positive
organism, Listeria. The experiments will
involve extensive genomic and proteomic studies of
this pathogenic bacterium, followed by site-directed
deletion of target genes (Fig. 9). After these genetic
constructions, we use analyses of membrane transport
by Listeria to identify its iron uptake pathways,
and we make determinations of the relationship between
iron acquisition and virulence, using the mouse model
system.
click image to
view full-size version
Figure 9. Allelic replacement in
L. monocytogenes. The figure depicts
the method of allelic exchange that we use for construction
of site-directed deletions (10).
Its intracellular
route of infectivity and ability to cross barriers
within the body distinguish L. monocytogenes
as a pathogen; the mechanisms of iron acquisition
in these microenvironments are obscure. In various
European nations human outbreaks of listeriosis strongly
link to raw and unpasteurized cheeses, milks, ice
creams, and raw meats or fish. 2% of raw milk worldwide
and 16% of dairy cows are infected. In the United
States, Listeria contaminates poultry, and
in particular, processed meats. Besides its often
tragic consequences in human infections (the second
major bacterial cause of food-borne death after Salmonella),
Listeria has superceded E. coli and
Salmonella as the most common cause of food
recalls in the US.
Although the understanding of Gram-negative membrane
transport systems dramatically progressed in the past
decade, knowledge of Gram-positive uptake mechanisms
is much less advanced. The general pathways of solute
uptake through the Gram-positive cell envelope are
largely undefined, and even less is known about the
mechanism by which iron-containing molecules, including
both small ferric siderophore complexes and larger
iron-binding eukaryotic proteins, pass through the
multilamellar peptidoglycan layer. Most importantly,
the biochemical characterization of cell envelope
iron transport systems in a prototypic Gram-positive
organism will provide a basis to compare and contrast
their efficiencies, specificities and mechanisms with
the equivalent systems of Gram-negative bacteria.
References
- Annamalai, R., B. Jin, Z. Cao, S. M.
Newton, and P. E. Klebba 2004. Recognition
of ferric catecholates by FepA. J Bacteriol.
186:3578-89.
- Cao, Z., Z. Qi, C. Sprencel, S. M. Newton,
and P. E. Klebba 2000. Aromatic components
of two ferric enterobactin binding sites in escherichia
coli fepA. Mol Microbiol. 37:1306-17.
- Cao, Z., P. Warfel, S. M. Newton, and
P. E. Klebba 2003. Spectroscopic observations
of ferric enterobactin transport.J Biol Chem.
278:1022-8.
- Jiang, X., M. A. Payne, Z. Cao, S. B.
Foster, J. B. Feix, S. M. Newton, and P. E. Klebba
1997. Ligand-specific opening of a gated-porin channel
in the outer membrane of living bacteria. Science.
276:1261-4.
- Jin, B., S.M. C. Newton, A. Charbit and
P.E. Klebba. In preparation. Iron acquisition
systems of Listeria.
- Klebba, P. E. 2003. Three paradoxes
of ferric enterobactin uptake. Frontiers in
Bioscience. 8:1422-1436.
- Klebba, P. E. 2004. Transport
Biochemistry of FepA. ASM Press.
- Newton, S. M., J. S. Allen, Z. Cao, Z.
Qi, X. Jiang, C. Sprencel, J. D. Igo, S. B. Foster,
M. A. Payne, and P. E. Klebba 1997. Double
mutagenesis of a positive charge cluster in the
ligand-binding site of the ferric enterobactin receptor,
FepA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94:4560-5.
- Newton, S. M., J. D. Igo, D. C. Scott,
and P. E. Klebba 1999. Effect of loop deletions
on the binding and transport of ferric enterobactin
by FepA. Mol Microbiol. 32:1153-1165.
- Newton, S. M., P. E. Klebba, C. Raynaud,
Y. Shao, X. Jiang, I. Dubail, C. Archer, C. Frehel,
and A. Charbit 2005. The svpA-srtB locus
of Listeria monocytogenes: Fur-mediated iron regulation
and effect on virulence. Mol Microbiol.
55:927-940.
- Payne, M. A., J. D. Igo, Z. Cao, S. B.
Foster, S. M. Newton, and P. E. Klebba
1997. Biphasic binding kinetics between FepA and
its ligands. J Biol Chem. 272:21950-5.
- Scott, D. C., Z. Cao, Z. Qi, M. Bauler,
J. D. Igo, S. M. Newton, and P. E. Klebba
2001. Exchangeability of N termini in the ligand-gated
porins of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem.
276:13025-33.
- Scott, D. C., S. M. Newton, and P. E.
Klebba 2002. Surface loop motion in FepA.
J Bacteriol. 184:4906-11.
Selected Other Publications
Rutz, J.M., J. Liu, J.A. Lyons, J.A. Goranson, S.K. Armstrong,
M.A. McIntosh, J.B. Feix, and P.E. Klebba. 1992. Formation
of a gated channel by a ligand-specific transport protein
in the bacterial outer membrane. Science 258:471-475.
Liu, J. J.M. Rutz, M.A. J.B. Feix, and P.E. Klebba. 1993
Permeability properties of the channel domain within the
ferric enterobactin receptor, FepA. Submitted, Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10653-10657.
Klebba, P.E., J.M. Rutz, J..Liu, and C.K. Murphy. 1993
Mechanisms of TonB-mediated iron transport through the
bacterial outer membrane. J. Bioenerg. and Biomem.
25:603-617.
Liu, J., Rutz, J., Klebba, P.E., and Feix, J., 1994. A
spin labeling study of ligand-induced conformational change
in the ferric enterobactin receptor, FepA. Biochemistry
33:13274-13283.
Newton, S.M.C., J.S. Allen, Z. Cao, Z. Qi, X. Jiang, C.
Sprencel, J.D. Igo, S.B. Foster, M.A. Payne, & P.E.
Klebba. 1997. Double mutagenesis of a positive charge
cluster in the ligand-binding site of the ferric enterobactin
receptor, FepA. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94:
4560-4565.
University of Oklahoma Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry 620 Parrington Oval, Rm 208 Norman, OK 73019-3051
|